A few days ago, we sort of told you about thought processes. We also promised to deliver another article; so deep, long, wide, and high that you would be flabbergasted, amazed, and totally blown away by its magnificent qualities in at least three dimensions. If you re-read the previous sentence you will certainly be awed by it alone. In fact, all of this introduction is absolutely mind-blowing. We can come up with such a brilliant verbal arrangement of intensive praise for our own article that the world should already begin paying us for what we are doing. Where’s the money?
I’m not certain if I want to keep writing this article seeing how there’s no money in it at the moment. Although, in a half-hearted attempt at being fair, I realize many of you readers think you could easily do better: for starters, you would write about something far more interesting than the quality of your own articles and your disappointment at not getting paid. Maybe so. We have seen no proof of that yet, mainly because we are not allowing any comments on our articles and thus, it is impossible for us to tell if any of you have actually written any articles. So, we score one over the rest of you right there.
Mixing all of the above with the fact that we have no way of telling whether we overestimate ourselves, we come to a certain conclusion: this is really really difficult, and we are probably just bungling it. But we still should be paid. Not out of pity but because we think it would be right. You, the readers, have nothing to do with this – except for the paying part which doesn’t seem to be happening. I think we just scored a second point.
“All right”, you say, “all you’re saying might have a grain of truth in it. But what about the thought processes? Aren’t you bound by the sacred pact of writing about the subject and not around it?” We might be if we got paid. I think the game is 3-0 now – with Quantum Bones in the lead.