The Shape of Sex

posted in: Newest, Psychology today - now. | 0

QuantumBones - The Shape of SexualityHuman Sexuality has long fascinated humans. Throughout history many cultures have sought to discover its geometric structure in order to gain a better understanding of its nature.

Sexuality, you understand, is cylindrical in form. That is to say that it functions on a tubular level. The Stoics argued passionately in favour of the torus, or a torus-like shape. Philosophers of the Han Dynasty favoured the tetrahedron. The Byronic view held a dualistic, contrary position, at once both ill defined and impossible to reconcile with modern tastes or values.

Within Western Traditions the Pythagorean Model held sway through to our own times. Pythagoras maintained that the only true shape to understand sexuality was a rhomboid, propelled along its axis at maximum velocity. But Pythagoras was dead wrong. Even before he was dead.

During the latter part of the 20th Century the School of Thought began a school of thought that would lead to the realisation of the cylindrical nature of sexuality. The groundbreaking work by Professor Curly Morton, author of “The Nuances of Vulvas”, finally revealed the true geometry of this most basic of natural traits.

I am become Priapus, Deflowerer of Worlds

Professor Morton’s work would issue a stark warning to mankind. Despite finally answering the question of our age, his research on the velocity of energy along the cylinder revealed many significant results. Sexuality, particularly Human Sexuality, had no top limit velocity. Peer review proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that it progressed beyond the limits of the Wankum Threshold. At this level the laws of physics break down with dangerous and unpredictable results. The scientific, as well as social, consequences had the potential to be devastating.